When Is Security No Longer For Security – Thousands Of Images Of Underage Students At Home Taken By School Issued Laptops
The place? Harriton High School, Lower Merion School District, in a wealthy suburb of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The concept? A school laptop rental program for students to have access to the computers that they need, issuing $1,000 Macintosh laptops to 2,300 students. The problem? The district employees who administered the laptops allegedly used a security feature on the laptops to spy on the schoolkids, at home.
The row started on November 11th, 2009, when student Blake Robbins, age 15, was called into his principal’s office on allegations of drug use. The evidence supplied to support this claim was a picture of Blake holding what appeared to be a handful of colorful little pills. There were two things wrong with this picture. The first was that the “pills” were in fact Mike and Ike candies. The second, this picture was taken in his home, from the camera built into his school-issued laptop. Without his knowledge or expressed consent.
From there it was discovered that the school had installed LANrev security software onto all of their laptops, in case of theft. The software was set up to take pictures every 15 seconds or 15 minutes (reports are very mixed over which it is) from the iSight camera without it showing any indication of being active. It also recorded screen shots, revealing chat sessions. And it recorded the internet address and DNS name to help in recovery. A theoretically useful tool.
That was allegedly abused.
There were over 400 pictures of Blake Robbins taken. In his home. Sometimes in slumber. Sometimes in various states of undress. He did not steal his laptop. The justification used to explain why the LANrev software was turned on was that his family did not pay their $55 insurance fee for the laptop.
Blake Robbins was not the only student improperly observed. Thousands of photos were taken of numerous other students as well.
In emails taken from the administrators of the laptops, one schoolboard employee is reported as having stated that it was like watching, “a little LMSD soap opera.“ To which the technology coordinator Carol Cafiero reportedly replied, “I know, I love it!”
In the ensuing lawsuit Carol Cafiero has refused to answer any questions put to her, or to turn over her personal computer to verify whether or not it has any voyeuristic images of the students downloaded onto it, citing her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Michael Perbix, the only other technician with the rights to use the LANrev software, has not fought the deposition.
Both Carol Cafiero, with a salary of $105,000, and Michael Perbix, with a salary of $86,000, are on paid leave while this drama unfolds in the courts.
The initial lawsuit has both prompted an FBI investigation into possible wiretap violations, and has stirred up a discussion amongst the parents about whether to support the potential class-action lawsuit or not.
Also of note are a list of rules uncovered from talking to students about what went on:
- Possession of a monitored Macbook was required for classes
- Possession of an unmonitored personal computer was forbidden and would be confiscated
- Disabling the camera was impossible
- Jailbreaking a school laptop in order to secure it or monitor it against intrusion was an offense which merited expulsion
You can read more about this ongoing drama at:




